|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
primary attraction of the Inside Passage is its pristine
beauty, so preserving it is essential. While much of
this vast area appears to be relatively uninhabited, it
is home to thousands of species that fill the air, water
and land, all of which are impacted by pollutants. So
are the people who live and work in British Columbia and
Alaska. Admittedly, there’s always the tough balance
between encouraging the cruise industry and regulating
it.
Cruise ship operations are subject to city/port,
provincial/state, federal, and international laws and
regulations. (In the United States, Coast Guard
regulations supersede even state policies or port
contracts.) In a vigilant attempt to monitor, maintain
and even improve upon current environmental quality,
Alaska has enacted some of the toughest standards for
cruise ships doing business in its waters. Cruise
companies also work in compliance with environmental
standards and laws set by the International Maritime
Organization (IMO), the International Convention for the
Prevention of Pollution from Ships at Sea (MARPOL), the
International Council of Cruise Lines (ICCL and CLIA),
various maritime classification societies and area
organizations. Failure to comply with safety management
systems can prevent a ship from operating from U.S.
ports.
Admittedly, 80 percent of all ocean pollution actually
originates from land-based activities; according to the
2004 U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy and no doubt,
cruise ships have some impact on the pollution problem.
For coastal waters, the greatest pollution threat
includes runoff from fertilizers, nutrients from
livestock manure, oil and grease from paved surfaces,
and drainage from abandoned mines.
To put passenger ships in perspective, they represent
.002 percent of all ocean-going vessels worldwide, yet
the cruise industry is the only segment of the maritime
industry that is on the cutting edge of environmental
protection. Over the past five years, cruise lines have
spent an average of $2 million per ship on new
environmental technologies and retrofits. Here are some of the
major environmental stewardship issues being addressed:
- Hazardous waste:
Products such as dry-cleaning
fluids or solvents; chemicals used for photo processing,
printing or photocopying; fluorescent or mercury vapour
lamps; and certain types of inks, medicines and
batteries are all hazardous wastes produced during
cruises. It is illegal to discharge any of these
products into the water so ships must have the capacity
to hold such hazardous wastes onboard until they can be
properly disposed of or recycled on land.
- Waste and garbage: In the last 10 years, cruise ships
have cut waste and garbage almost in half—all while
sustaining an average annual growth in passenger
capacity of 7.6 percent. Crystal Cruises’ “Crystal
Clean” program encourages passengers to adopt
anti-litter efforts. Recycling bins are next to waste
bins, sports programs use biodegradable golf balls and
in-cabin toiletries are specially packaged, among other
initiatives.
- Wastewater: Effluents
(sewage or “black water”) are typically treated by
traditional type II Marine Sanitation Devices (MSD) that
many consider ineffective for protecting marine waters.
In Alaska, most ships have or are installing Advanced
Wastewater Treatment Systems (AWTS). These systems
should include ultraviolet light polishing to kill any leftover bacteria,
monitoring equipment, and storage tanks.
A 2004 Memorandum of Understanding governing Puget Sound
waters, signed by members of the NorthWest CruiseShip
Association (NWCA), ensures that the Washington State
Department of Ecology can conduct vessel inspections to
verify proper functioning of AWTS and requires that
cruise ships take and report on monthly sampling of
their grey water (from showers, the laundry, salons,
kitchens/galleys) and black water, and mandates that
treated sewage (sludge) cannot be discharged within 12
nautical miles of shore. Grey water and black water
treated by a Coast Guard approved AWTS can be discharged
anywhere. According to the agreement, untreated grey
water is not allowed to be discharged anywhere.
These standards are tougher than current federal law
that stipulates discharge is allowed only while a ship
is more than 4 nautical miles (7 km) from shore and
underway at a speed of 6 knots (11 km/h or 7 mph) or
greater unless the effluent is treated to the state of
Alaska standards for advanced wastewater treatment.
Many cruise ships now use advanced technologies to
process wastewater generated on - board to a higher
standard than required by most coastal municipalities.
Canadian firms helping to reduce waste include Zenon
Environmental Inc. of Oakville, Ontario, and Hydroxyl
Systems of Victoria, British Columbia. Tests from
treated wastewater from Xenon’s systems have regularly
shown treated water has zero fecal coli form per 100 ml
and no detectable suspended solids. These results are
better than 98 percent of land-based sewage
treatment systems.
- Air emissions: All NWCA member cruise lines have
vessels that surpass air quality standards set by the
EPA Environmental Protection Agency and MARPOL ANNEX VI
requirements. Some ships have installed hybrid
propulsion systems powered by diesel and gas turbine
engines to reduce air emissions. Where possible, ships
plug into shore power while in port. Juneau has taken
the lead with this initiative, with Princess Cruises
investing $4.5 million to develop a shore power facility
in cooperation with the Alaska Light and Power Company.
During day-long visits to the port, Princess ships
connect to the new shore power distribution system that
allows them to shut down their engines, thereby cutting
smoke emissions while in port.
- Fuel efficiency: Fuel used by NWCA cruise ships has
the lowest sulfur content available - averaging
between 1.9 and 2.1 percent. As well, state-of-the-art
rudderless propulsion systems (azipods) offer increased
fuel efficiency while providing a high degree of
manoeuvrability. New ships powered by gas-turbine
engines use a state-of-the-art incinerator to remove
dioxins from gas emissions, thereby reducing exhaust
emissions by up to 90 percent.
Some cruise lines have taken leadership roles in
environmental stewardship. For example, several have
developed environmental programs on board their vessels.
In 1993, Princess became the first company to appoint a
full-time environmental expert as well as providing
education and training programs for all crewmembers, all as part of their “Planet
Princess” environmental health program. Since 2001
Holland America has added an additional second engineer
to oversee environmental matters that include bilge
waste management, emissions, garbage handling and
processing of wastewater.
|
|
|
|
|